On Tuesday this week, the U.S. Iternational Trade Commission voted to investing
allegations that LG, Nokia and others were importing smartphones that infringe
integrated circuit patents held by Tela Innovations Inc. ITC also said it would
investigate Google, Motorola, HTC and Pantech to see if these companies
violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 by importing phones that copy
seven of Tela’s patents.
Many large mobile phone and tablet companies, such as Apple, Samsung,
Nokia have been involved in a large number of patent disputes. Tela’s actions
remind us how easily those electronics device manufacturers can be sued by the components
of the technology patent developer or supporters. I remembered on Monday’s
lecture, Dr. Well mentioned that there were more than 250,000 active patents
relevant to today’s smartphone. Thus, it’s quite difficult for the smartphone companies
to check every single patent before release their new products, which also
caused a relatively large number of smartphone related lawsuit.
California-based Tela sued those companies in both ITC and Delaware
federal court last month. In Delaware’s court, Tela requested for permanent banning
and compensation. In ITC, Tela proposed the prohibition of infringing devices
into the U.S. market. I think that is another big headache or nightmare for
those companies. ITC has the similar right as the court, once it has been
hearing and found that certain types of imports into the U.S violates U.S intellectual
property, ITC has the right to issue an order prohibiting the import of such
goods to the U.S. More and more companies choose to sue other companies due to
the following reasons: the investigation process of ITC is faster than the
court; ways of finding evidences are loose; ITC can effective banned the import
of oversea products into the U.S. market; judges in ITC have more experience in
patent litigation.
In my opinion, it seems like Tela would not like to negation with any of
these companies. Tela was founded in 2005. If I were Tela, I would discuss with
those companies about licensing issue rather than sue them through ITC. As a
young and starting company, I think it might be good to make friends than making
enemies. Meanwhile, as an electronic technology company, it will have connections
with other technique companies. I don’t doubt the profit Tela can get whether
it can win or lose the case; however, unless it is big enough as Samsung, which
is strong enough to fight with other big companies. Otherwise, it might be a
huge obstacle for Tela to develop in the future.
Interesting post, I wonder what kinds of patents were allegedly being infringed. You also highlighted an interesting point - why did Tela opt to fight these patents instead of try and settle.
ReplyDeleteI think Tela is taking a huge gamble. Being a start-up, it might think that it is able to take more risk, and the up-sides to winning the lawsuit seems better than the settlement. If Tela wins, whether or not the profit is great as what Xuan mentioned, it makes a name for itself among all other tech companies. Everyone will know who Tela is, and it might able to leverage on this lawsuit to win other lawsuits, providing much better opportunities for it in future.
ReplyDelete