The patent war between
Apple and Samsung provided us with some valuable inspirations. Let’s take a
look at what we have learned so far. On Monday’s lecture, we defined the patent
again as a way that intends to protect innovations within country to give inventors
an exclusive period to prevent unauthorized use. However, when the technology
has accumulated a considerable number of patents, the system may become he obstacle
to innovation and cost highly for the whole community.
At the beginning,
this system may encourage some good ideas and design patents. However, when
patent infringement becomes a legal weapon, which has been used frequently, inventors
and entrepreneurs have to spend a lot of energy to find out whether his/her invention
may be infringement or be complained against. This would force companies to
file lots of patent claims, or purchase a variety of patents to establish their
own repository of patent. Sometimes, they do it not for using it, but hide it
fight back their competitors, such as how Google bought Motorola.
In my opinion, the
patent system has disobeyed its traditional theory of intellectual property
right, which stimulates innovation while protects the interests of the inventor.
We can see from Apple-Samsung patent law: the patent system not only increases social
costs, but also becoming an obstacle to innovation and development. I think in order to
ultimately benefit the public interest; the companies need genuine openness and
innovation and see their own weakness.
interesting.
ReplyDeletesamsung lost in this "war" to google in japan – because they didn’t negotiate in good faith with Apple before bringing the case to court. im guessing it's also because they want public attention regarding this matter – to increase brand recognition, market share, etc.