I did some after
class research on trademark and copyright. Based on my research, trademark is
defined as a recognizable sign, symbol, or expression that can express the
products’ identities. I think a good trademark should be simple and
striking so that people don’t need to spend a lot of time to memorize it, but
they can recognize it whenever they see it. In my opinion, the good example is
Nike and Target. Whenever you see the big red check mark, you know Nike’s
stores or products are around you. Whenever I am on the highway, I can see
Target’s sign easily among other stores. Based on some readings I got from
United States Patent and Trademark Office(USPTO), it seems like the office will
examine every new trademark before approving it. I wonder how they check the
likelihood/similarity among so many trademarks. Do they use some kind of
software to check it?
I’m interested in copyright when I took my first class in the U.S. Many
instructors/professors would mention “copyright” somewhere on the syllabus.
Based on my understanding, copyright protects the original literary work.
Whenever someone needs to use the material, they need to give credit to the
original author. In the U.S, the copyright term varies. It depends a lot of
factors, such as the type of works, date of publication. For example, if the work is published after
2002, the copyright term will be 70
years after the death of author. If a work of corporate authorship, 95 years
from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever expires first. Unlike
trademark, I think copyright is being protected automatically with registering.
Wait a second, if an author died without any children or relatives. Where does
the profit go after he died?
Thanks for sharing your research about Trademarks vs. Copyright. I had some similar thoughts when I got my Kindle recently, and was told that any books older than a certain date were available for free. I immediately downloaded 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, but found myself wondering what kind of copyright law allowed me to do this? Shouldn't there be some successor to Jules Verne's ownership?
ReplyDelete